Medical devices + IVDs
Current focusEngineering baseline: US, EU, Great Britain/Northern Ireland, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Japan, and MDSAP. The 250-jurisdiction expansion register remains claim-gated.
View solutionQMS Studio connects quality signals, controlled evidence, human decisions, and regulatory change across medical devices, IVDs, and an honestly scoped therapeutic-biotech expansion.
Interactive demonstration · Synthetic records · Human approval required

Bring complaints, deviations, OOS/OOT results, lots, suppliers, equipment, methods, analysts, controlled procedures, and prior CAPAs into one cited evidence trail.
The analysis stays empty until governed retrieval runs. No uncited conclusion is filled in.
AI assembles evidence and drafts hypotheses. It cannot determine root cause, reportability, batch disposition, CAPA approval, effectiveness, or closure.
One governed evidence layer, with controls and terminology that stay honest about each domain’s maturity.
Engineering baseline: US, EU, Great Britain/Northern Ireland, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Japan, and MDSAP. The 250-jurisdiction expansion register remains claim-gated.
View solutionA separate product concept for deviations, OOS/OOT, batch impact, QA disposition, validation, quality agreements, lot genealogy, and PQR/APQR—not part of the current device/IVD PRD or corpus.
View solutionQC/PT failure, instrument, reagent, analyst evidence, and controlled corrective action. CLIA operations remain a separate compliance pack.
View solutionMulti-client quality events, affected sponsors, quality-agreement obligations, delegated actions, and outsourced-manufacturing oversight.
View solutionThis is a separate product concept outside the current medical-device and IVD PRD and regulatory corpus. Production requirements, configuration, validation, integration, and qualified regulatory assessment remain required.
21 CFR Parts 210/211 and applicable Parts 600–680 · 21 CFR Part 11 · EU GMP Parts I/II and selected annexes · ICH Q7–Q10/Q12.
Concept-mapped—not part of the device/IVD baseline, certified, validated, or claimed as pharmaceutical-GMP coverage.
Every item carries an exact date or watch-only status, an applicability boundary, an evidence gap, and a human decision gate.
Inventory, identifier, actor, and evidence-completeness work for applicable legacy devices.
Software-product evidence preservation, disclosure readiness, and defensible decision records.
Provider/deployer role, intended use, Annex I product link, model inventory, and human oversight.
Reference and retention sample inventories, quantities, storage, test capability, and written agreements.
Applicability branching for upstream donor, testing, collection, release, and relevant ATMP supply chains.
Scenario planning for data integrity, cloud/supplier controls, computerized systems, and AI governance.
Official sources: EUDAMED rollout · Product Liability Directive · AI Omnibus · EU GMP Annex 19 · EU SoHO Regulation · EU GMP draft consultation.
The PRD includes the generated requirements. Before launch in a market, confirm the local sources, configure the controls, validate the deployment, and obtain qualified approval.
Search the 250-entry register, inspect local medical-device and IVD instruments, separate vendor-sale obligations, and see exactly where acquisition or discovery remains incomplete.
The demo shows the control model. The Trust Center separates demonstrated patterns, production requirements, and independent assurance.
Human-governed AIDemonstrated in synthetic workflowsDemonstrated
AI provenance + evidence linksVisible source versions and decision stateDemonstrated
Part 11 / regulated-record control designCustomer testing and approval requiredSpecified
HIPAA-enabled deployment profile12 requirements specified; BAA and production evidence required before PHISpecified
SOC 2 Type II / ISO 27001No report or certification claimedPlanned
Public demo dataNo confidential data, personal data, PHI, or regulated recordsSynthetic only
Map a complaint, deviation, OOS, supplier issue, or regulatory change against QMS Studio.