Therapeutic biotech · expansion preview

From quality signal
to defensible QA decision.

Connect deviations and OOS signals with lots, suppliers, equipment, methods, analysts, procedures, and change history. AI assembles evidence and drafts hypotheses; qualified QA retains every material decision.

Evidence-linked hypotheses · Human decision gates · US/EU GMP horizon

Investigation Intelligence Batch DS-26-118 Media MC-884 Supplier SUP-019 Change CHG-117Qualified-person review required
Connected investigation

Quality evidence across the batch lifecycle.

The QMS coordinates evidence and decisions. It does not replace LIMS, MES, ERP, pharmacovigilance, or qualified release authority.

  1. 01Deviation or OOS/OOTSignal, source result, specification, method, and initial assessment
  2. 02Batch + patient impactLot genealogy, material, equipment, site, market, and uncertainty
  3. 03Evidence-led investigationSupporting, contrary, and missing confirmation evidence
  4. 04QA dispositionAuthenticated human authority; no AI release decision
  5. 05CAPA + effectivenessOwners, protocol, observation period, and deliberate closure
  6. 06PQR / APQRRoadmap: product and process lifecycle review
Control matrix

What the expansion does—and does not—claim.

“Supported demo” means an interactive synthetic-data demonstration. Customer intended-use validation is always required.

Investigation IntelligenceSupported demo

Connected synthetic deviation/OOS story with cited hypotheses and human gates

Deviation intake and investigationConfigurable

Lot, equipment, method, analyst, supplier, SOP, and change links

CAPA and effectivenessConfigurable

Evidence-backed draft, owners, protocol, and human closure

Change / technology transferConfigurable

Quality, validation, and regulatory impact in one controlled record

Supplier / CDMO quality agreementsConfigurable

Obligations, affected products and sites, and notification deadlines

OOS/OOT Phase I/IIRoadmap

Dedicated laboratory and manufacturing-review workflow planned

Batch impact and dispositionRoadmap

AI may draft considerations; qualified QA/QP retains authority

Process validation / CPV / PQRRoadmap

Lifecycle workspace and validated manufacturing integrations planned

Pharmacovigilance and clinical safetyNot covered

Requires a separate validated safety platform

MES / EBR / LIMS / ERP executionNot covered

QMS coordinates decisions; source systems execute testing and manufacturing

Representative regulatory basis

Mapped baselines, not blanket coverage.

US therapeutic coverage references Parts 210/211 plus only applicable biologics provisions. EU coverage is use-case specific. ICH Q10 is a lifecycle model—not a certification.

United States21 CFR Parts 210/211 · applicable Parts 600–680 · Part 11 control requirements · FDA data-integrity and validation guidance

European UnionEU GMP Parts I/II · applicable Annexes 1, 2, 11, 15, 16, and 19 · ATMP Part IV only where applicable

Lifecycle modelsICH Q7, Q8, Q9, Q10, and Q12 mapped according to product and regional applicability

Biotech regulatory horizon

Prepare early. Label proposals honestly.

Binding dates get applicability-led work. Drafts and anticipated milestones get scenario planning—never overdue status.

51 days

Revised EU GMP Annex 19 applies

Reference/retention sample inventory, quantities, storage, testing capability, and quality agreements.

Binding future
Watch-only

Draft revised EU GMP Part IV for ATMPs

Scenario map only; planned publication is not an effective date.

Watch-only
368 days

EU SoHO Regulation generally applies

Applicability branch for relevant upstream donor, testing, collection, release, and ATMP supply chains.

Binding future
Watch-only

EU GMP Chapter 4, Annex 11, and new Annex 22

Closed-consultation drafts for documentation, computerized systems, and AI governance.

Watch-only

Anticipated dates may change. Applicability must be assessed by qualified regulatory personnel against final official text.

Expansion preview

See the evidence model.
Then validate the intended use.

Explore the synthetic investigation, review explicit boundaries, and bring one therapeutic-biotech workflow to map.